This is an interesting idea which brings to mind a problem
a former professor posed in class regarding students who drop classes at the
last possible minute. As he described
it, this is harmful to students in several ways. One, it takes up a space someone else may
have been able to take, perhaps even desperately needed. Two, it actually drives up the cost of
tuition indirectly. When a class is full
at the beginning of the semester, the department must assign a professor to teach
each one of those classes. However, as
people drop the class, the professor must still teach their sections even
though the number of students remaining in what was once three or four separate
sections could have been consolidated into one. The result of this is more
professors each teaching less kids. Professors
must be paid, buildings must be maintained, and the cost of tuition indirectly
rises.
It has been quite some time since I was in the class I am
speaking of and my recollection of the exact idea is a bit patchy. In essence, my former professor’s solution to
this was an idea called “drop tickets”.
At the beginning of a student’s college career, they are issued a set
number of drop tickets, perhaps 3 or 4.
Every time they drop a class, they must surrender one of these drop
tickets. At the end of their college
career, they can turn in every unused drop ticket for cash or some other type
of reward, what exactly it was I can’t quite remember.
This seems like a use for Illinibucks, potentially solving
two issues at once. The first issue,
students need to get into classes but aren’t able to because they are
full. The second issue, students take up
space in a class that someone else needs and then drop it at the last
minute. These would both be addressed by
requiring students to use their Illinibucks to register for classes, as well as
drop those classes. If a harsher “penalty”
were to be assigned to dropping a class, perhaps students would not add classes
just to fill up their schedule only to drop them later on. This would result in students taking classes
they actually needed, and hopefully less students being shut out of classes
they need because people who don’t need the class are taking up available
spaces.
Another potential use of Illinibucks which I believe would
appeal to upperclassmen especially, would be the option to move their
registration priority up, enabling them to take sections of classes that meet
at favorable times, as these usually fill up quite rapidly. A slight
modification to this could be the ability to register for classes that may be blocked
due to departmental restrictions. Again, upperclassmen trying to build a
favorable schedule may want to take an elective but aren’t able to register for
it until after a certain time. The “easy”
electives are often filled by that point, this would allow students to bypass that
restriction. Obviously there would be
massive logistical issues with any of these suggestions that would need to be worked
out as well.
Setting the correct price would be critical to the success of
Illinibucks. Set the price too high and
nobody/very few students will use them.
This would negate the usefulness of the Illinibucks system to the
students. At the other end of the spectrum, set the price too low and there
will be a free for all. This would also
negate the usefulness of the system because there would be little to no reason for
students to conserve their Illinibucks.
If everyone had unlimited money, would anyone actually be rich?
My experience is that there can be quite a bit of churn in class membership during the first ten days and the system as it is set up now encourages that. There are drops after those ten days, but not at such a high rate. Quite a while ago I looked at the data for this for the entire campus, covering the 1994 and 1995. The findings were that the ratio of final enrollments to 10 day enrollments actually was quite high - often above 95%. Engineering had the lowest of these, around 92%. So the problem your professor worried about exists, but may not be so severe as to incur the excess costs that concerned him. Elsewhere, it might be more of an issue. An alternative solution would be to enroll a few more students above the capacity limit, assuming that by end of term enrollments will fall below the capacity limit. In the past there have been students who have sat in the aisles for lectures. Given the increased reliance on video as an alternative, that may now be the better solution.
ReplyDeleteI would definitely agree that the shift towards online and digital content rather than in person lectures will change the way enrollment capacity works. Not only is the size of your class no longer limited by space, but it also no longer requires the same time commitment as one professor can teach a far larger number of students simultaneously. This then brings up the question of the quality of that teaching, and whether online lectures can achieve the same results as face to face interaction. Although I currently don't have any data to back up this claim, it is a widely debated topic and something I may consider posting about in the future.
ReplyDelete